Revised Open Prompt #2

Open Prompt #2----NEW POST

1994. In some works of literature, a character who appears briefly, or does not appear at all, is a significant presence. Choose a novel or play of literary merit and write an essay in which you show how such a character functions in the work. You may wish to discuss how the character affects action, theme, or the development of other characters. Avoid plot summary.

In the novel, The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald includes a character that we know of by the name Owl-Eyed Man. The Owl-Eyed Man does not appear very often in the story, but all of his apperances are significant to the story as a whole. Few characters know of the Owl-Eyed Man, but he seems to know many things about the characters. He sees it all without creating a disturbance, just like an owl. His meaning towards the novel may be much more complex than his exterior suggests. 

Fitzgerald introduces us to the Owl-Eyed Man early in the story.  He is first seen reading in the library of Gatsby's house at one of his parties. Owl-Eyes believes that Gatsby is superficial and along with his personality, the books in the library are also fake. He suggests that similar to Gatsby, the books look nice on the outside but they are filled with blank pages. This assumption gives the readers one opinion of Gatsby, and most likely the opinion of many other people including the guests at the party. As Owl-Eyes discovers that the books are actually real, he begins to see Gatsby in a different light. Nick Carraway's reaction of Owl-Eyes affects his first impression of Gatsby and the guest he has at his parties. After the party Nick sees Owl-Eyes getting out of a car that was driven into a ditch. The drunken crash changes the impression of Owl-Eyes. He is no longer an intellectual figure, but a man that is involved in depreciating means of society. 

The eyes appear again, but this time on a billboard. The eyes of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg that watch over the Valley of Ashes can be related back to the Owl-Eyed man. Although this isnt the same concept, the eyes serve similar purposes. The eyes on the billboard watch over everything, they see it all. They represent the unfiltered view of society; they watch everything that goes on and nothing can be hidden from their sight. Just like Owl-Eyes it represents the sight of knowledge. Nick is first startled by the billboard and he isnt sure what to make of it, similar to his first encouter with Owl-Eyes. The billboard contributes to the theme that someone is always watching, even when one might think not. 

 At the end of the novel, there are few people to show up at Gatshy's funeral, and the Owl-Eyed Man is one of them. The Owl-Eyed Man was one of the few who truly understood Gatsby, or he understood him more than any other character. He was able to see something that no one else was able to see in Gatsby. His glasses, are a symbol of intelligence, and his name, Owl-Eyed Man, also contributes to this. He is wise like an owl, therefore he was able to see what others couldnt. He had the ability to look past the superficial boundaries. 

Response to Course Material #6

After all of the annotations, I was very relieved to move on from Hamlet. I definitely enjoyed reading Shakespeare, but I felt it was time for something new. I was also very grateful for what ended up to be our final. Worrying about failing the terms test AGAIN was not something I was looking forward too. Acting out Hamlet as our final was a great alternative and I actually learned a lot. Each group's interpretation of their selected scene made me realize how many different ways there are to take in a matter. Not one group's performance was exactly the same, I thought this might pose as an issue. Watching the finals I noticed how each factor in a play can contribute to the effect received from the audience. Each specific movement can mean something, this is what Shakespeare left out by not including specific stage directions. I think he wanted us to be as imaginative as possible with what he left us. After realizing this technique Shakespeare is famous for, I started to notice it everywhere. In every text, art, conversation, etc., there are items missing for others to fill them in. The world around us it completely open to an individual's interpretation.

So far, I've found Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead by Tom Stoppard very interesting, and also very confusing! I think the techniques Stoppard uses are complex and very new to me. I like how the story overlaps with Hamlet, telling the story of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. That allows for the comparison between the two to be rather basic. I can't wait until I find out more of what's really going on in Stoppard's head, I just want to follow along! I'm kind of excited to re-read and annotate this play because I know it will help me see all of the details and meanings behind Stoppard's choices.

Hamlet Summary/Analysis

Author: William Shakespeare

Setting: The Elsinore castle in Denmark

Plot:

Act 1

Scene 1- Platform at Elsinore; Bernardo, Francisco, Horatio, Marcellus and Ghost

-First sight of the ghost, a warning to Denmark

Scene 2- Room in castle; King, Cornelius, Voltimand, Laertes, Polonius, Hamlet, Queen

·     = King gives speech about how King Hamlet's death is done with and to focus on the new marriage

·      =Laertes asks the King for permission to go back to France

·      =King tells Hamlet to get over his father’s death, stay in Denmark and love him as a father

·      -Hamlet reminisces of his father, Horatio and Marcellus tell Hamlet about the ghost

Scene 3- Room in Polonius’s house; Laertes, Ophelia and Polonius

·      =Laertes says goodbye and advises Ophelia that Hamlet is 100% wrong for her and to stop spending time with her

·     = Polonius gives Laertes advice and then agrees with Laertes advice to Ophelia and lectures Ophelia more

Scene 4- The platform; Hamlet, Horatio, Marcellus and Ghost

·      =The ghost reappears and tells Hamlet to follow him. Horatio warns him of all the possible dangers and reasons why not to follow

·      =Hamlet claims it’s his fate

Scene 5- The platform (different than before); Ghost, Hamlet, Horatio, Marcellus

·      =Hamlet speaks to the ghost and he tells Hamlet that he needs to seek revenge

·      =Hamlet won’t tell Horatio and Marcellus about his conversation and begins to act mad. Tells them he may pretend to act mad

Act 2

Scene 1- Room in Polonius’s house

·      =The players arrive and Hamlet has one execute a very emotional speech of revenge. Plans to have the players perform a play that reenacts the murder of King Hamlet. Hamlet wants to see the reaction of the King to confirm his suspicions

Act 3

Scene 1- room in the castle; King, Queen, Polonius, Ophelia, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern, Lords

·      =Rosencrantz and Guildenstern tell the King and Queen that Hamlet was amused by the players and Hamlet has invited them to his play

·      =Polonius gives Ophelia a prayer book to mask her bad deeds, Polonius and King hide to ease drop of Ophelia and Hamlet’s conversation

·     = Hamlet enters and recites “To be or not to be” speech

·      =Hamlet tells Ophelia to go to a nunnery, makes it clear that he is not mad for her love

·      =Polonius and the King realize that Hamlet didn’t become mad because of Ophelia’s love

Scene 2- hall in the castle; Hamlet, 3 players, Polonius, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern, Horatio, King, Queen, Ophelia

·      =Hamlet tells the players how to act with real emotion, no exaggerating

·      =Hamlet tells Horatio to watch the King’s reaction during the scene of this father’s death

·      =Hamlet calls Ophelia a prostitute, insults the King and Queen

·      =Play begins; happy couple, King is poisoned in his sleep through his ear and his crown is removed. Poisoner gives the Queen a lot of gifs and she accepts his love

·      =The players of the King and Queen embrace their faithful love. Queen promises to never remarry

·      =Gertrude, Claudius and Ophelia find it to be offensive

·      =Horatio and Hamlet talk and confirm that the King’s reaction proved he was guilty

·      =Guildenstern and Rosencrantz tell Hamlet that the King and Queen are upset and the Queen wants to talk to him

Scene 3- a room in the castle; King, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern, Polonius, Hamlet, Queen

·      =King tells Rosencrantz and Guildenstern that they are going to England with Hamlet so his insanity isn’t a threat

·      =The King admits he is scared that his sins wont be forgiven, guilty, prays

·      =Hamlet debates killing the King but decides to wait and kill him when he is doing something wrong

Scene 4- the Queen’s closet; Queen, Polonius, Hamlet, Ghost

·      =Polonius tells Queen to tell Hamlet he has caused trouble, Polonius hides

·      =Hamlet and the Queen argue, Polonius calls for help and Hamlet (thinking he is the King) stabs him

·      =Hamlet insults the Queen and makes her feel guilty of all of her sins

·      =Ghost enters and tells Hamlet to re-focus on revenge

·      =Hamlet makes the Queen feel guilt for her sins and she tells Hamlet she will make things right

Act 4

Scene 1- a room in the castle; King, Queen, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern

·      =The queen tells the King that Hamlet is mad and killed Polonius. The King is very upset and regretful. Commands for Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to go find Hamlet, and bring him back along with Polonius’s body

Scene 2- a different room in the castle; Hamlet, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern

·      =Rosencrantz and Guildenstern ask where the body is; Hamlet insults them by calling them sponges of the King. Then Hamlet goes to see the King

Scene 3- another room in the castle; King, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern, Hamlet

·      =Rosencrantz and Guildenstern return to tell the King that Hamlet wouldn’t tell them where Polonius’s body is

·      =Hamlet tells the King he buried it

·      =The King tells Hamlet he’s going to England for his own safety, then reveals to himself that Hamlet will be killed

Scene 4- a plain in Denmark; Fortinbras with army, Captain, Hamlet, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern

·      =Fortinbras Norway army enters wanting to cross to fight a pointless war over a worthless piece of land

·      =Hamlet is determined to stop wasting time and seek revenge

Scene 5- Elsinore, a room in the castle; Horatio, Queen, gentleman, Ophelia, Claudius, Laertes and his army, messenger

·      =Queen agrees to seeing Ophelia

·      =Ophelia acts mad and communicates through songs to share why she’s gone mad

·      =King pities Ophelia and worries about his safety because Laertes might think he killed Polonius

·      =Messenger comes to tell the Royals that a mob lead by Laertes has come demanding Laertes King

·      =Laertes comes demanding details of his father. Plots to seek revenge

·      =Ophelia enters in song and sings of her fathers death, gives out symbolic flowers

·      =King promises to help revenge with Laertes when found innocent

Scene 6- another room in the castle; Horatio, gentleman, sailors

·      =Sailors come to bring letters to Horatio (from Hamlet), Hamlet has also sent letters to the King

·      =Hamlet demands for Horatio to come to his rescue

·      =The pirates have brought Hamlet back to Denmark

Scene 7- another room in the castle; the King, Laertes, messenger, Queen

·      =The King wants to hear Laertes to call him a friend so he can no longer feel threatened

·      =Messenger brings letters to the King which reveal the return of Hamlet

·      =King and Laertes plot to kill Hamlet: poisonous sword and cup

·      =The Queen brings news that Ophelia has drowned in the stream

·      =Laertes is very upset and leaves. The King follows him with the Queen to make sure he remains calm

Act 5

Scene 1- churchyard; gravediggers, Hamlet, Horatio, King, Queen, Laertes, corpse of Ophelia

·     = Gravediggers question Ophelia’s proper burial for suicide

·      =Hamlet asks questions about the skulls, bodies, and graves

·      =Laertes isn’t satisfied with the burial; he jumps in the grave, Hamlet jumps in after him and they start fighting

·      =Hamlet claims that he loved Ophelia the most

·      =Gertrude and Horatio go after Hamlet

·      =King tries to make Laertes focus on their plan

Scene 2- a hall in the castle; Hamlet, Horatio, Osric (courtier), Lord, King, Queen, officers, Laertes, Fortinbras, Ambassadors

·      =Hamlet tells Horatio he found papers ordering Hamlet’s death from Claudius. He took and changed the papers and is ready to get revenge

·      =Osric appears with a message for Hamlet, informs him of the bet the King place and of Laertes excellence in fencing

·      =Lord comes to deliver a message from the King asking when he wants to fence Laertes, Hamlet says whenever the King pleases

·      =Horatio warns Hamlet he thinks he is going to lose the bet and if he doesn’t want to do it, he shouldn’t. Hamlet believes destiny will sort everything out

·      =Hamlet apologizes to Laertes and blames it on his madness, Laertes doesn’t forgive him for hurting his reputation

·      =The King announces he will drink to every hit

·      =Hamlet hits Laertes twice, then Gertrude assists Hamlet and Gertrude drinks to his good luck and happinessà cup was poisoned

·      =The Queen falls and her last words are, “no, Hamlet, the drink, I am poisoned.”

·      =Hamlet and Laertes switch swords; both people are infected with poison now

·      =Laertes falls and tells Hamlet of the poisoned sword

·      =Hamlet stabs the King and forces him to drink the poison, King dies

·      =Laertes asks for Hamlet to forgive him, then dies

·      =Hamlet is dying and asks Horatio to tell everyone the truth

·      =Hamlet is dying, he wishes he could hear the news from England, but wants Fortinbras to know that he has his vote, then dies

·      =Young Fortinbras enters with him ambassadors delivering the message that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead

·      =Fortinbras asks Horatio what happened to everyoneà tragedy

·      =Fortinbras will restore his power in Denmark and respectfully carry out Hamlet’s corpse

Significant Characters:

Hamlet

·      =Determined to kill Claudius to avenge his father

·      =Indecisive

·      =Filled with philosophical thoughts

·      =Pretends to act mad

·      =Feels trapped in Elsinore, and trapped in Denmark

·      =Horatio is his only honest friend

·      =Uses complicated language to confuse everyone he talks to

Gertrude

·   =   Mother to Hamlet

·      =Widow to King Hamlet

·      =Married to King Claudius

·      =Completely disregards her past with King Hamlet, disrespectful

·      =Wishes Hamlet would move on from his father’s death and embrace his new family

Claudius

·      =Poisoned King Hamlet, who was his brother, so he could marry Gertrude and take over the thrown

·      =Wants to figure out why Hamlet went mad

·      =Obsessed with power

·      =Greedy

·      =Can’t really make any decisions for himself, always told what to do

·      =Wants to send Hamlet away to England, so he can kill him

Ophelia

·     = Hamlet’s lover

·      =Leaves Hamlet because her brother and father told her to do so

·      =Listens to whatever her family tells her to do

·      =Lies to Hamlet, but always acts innocent

·      =Goes mad after her father dies

·      =Drowns herself in the river

Polonius

·      =Father to Ophelia and Laertes

·      =Gives out a lot of advice; Ophelia, Laertes, the King

·      =Sneaky

·      =Killed by Hamlet while he was spying on Hamlet and Gertrude

Laertes

·     = Ophelia is his sister and Polonius is his dad

·      =Leaves to go to France

·      =Comes after his father’s death

·      =Wants to kill Hamlet

   Narrative Voice:
There is no narrative voice because it's a play. The author's tone throughout the play was dark and revengeful. It sounded somewhat crazy and really added an affect to the characters reactions. Some things that were symbolic in the play were; the ear, poison, gossip, Denmark, Elsinore, the crown, the sword, the ghost, the flowers, the letters, and many more. I thought the imagery that Shakespeare had provided vivid imagery that helped the audience imagine what Shakespeare was trying to convey

   Theme: No bad deed is let go or forgotten. 
This theme is supported throughout the entire play. First, King Hamlet makes it clear to Hamlet Claudius's bad deed of killing him. This revealed secret sets the plot, and Hamlet must set things straight. The reappearance of the ghost during the conversation of Hamlet and his mother is a reminder to take care of his business. Once again, the theme is present by not letting Hamlet forget his duty. As the play goes on each character has to avenge themselves one way or another. The reputation of their family is too important to each one to let a bad deed go forgotten. 

Quotes:

"To be, or not to be: that is the question" -Hamlet
Definitely one of the most famous quotes from all of Shakespeare's work. Could it be because this line brings up a universal debate: the question of life or death? Or could it be symbolic and meaningful in another fashion. I think this quote is important because it is one of Hamlet's longest monologue, and in that it discusses his main internal issue. The issue of whether or not to act upon his revenge. This quote is meaningful because it covers a lot of character development. Hamlet truly questions whether of not to play out his actions. His philosophical questions allow the audience to see Hamlet communicate with his self-conscious and look into his deeper thoughts.

"Something is rotten in the state of Denmark" -Marcellus
This quote introduces a very important theme and motif in the play. This quote was said in the first act of the play, which sets a dark and spooky tone for the entire act. This warning is something that is about to be very common in Denmark. Marcellus is a guard, so it makes sense for him to give the first warning of Danger. Later in this scene Hamlet talks to his father and learns about his death. The ghost brings the rottenness to Denmark, and sets the rotten State. 



  

Prompt Revisions #1

1976. The conflict created when the will of an individual opposes the will of the majority is the recurring theme of many novels, plays, and essays. Select the work of an essayist who is in opposition to his or her society; or from a work of recognized literary merit, select a fictional character who is in opposition to his or her society. In a critical essay, analyze the conflict and discuss the moral and ethical implications for both the individual and the society. Do not summarize the plot or action of the work you choose.

In the novel The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain centers around a child's perception of society. Living in Mississippi in the 1880's, Huck was often confused of his placement in society. He was told how to act towards social classes, but he couldn't understand why individuals were treated differently. Huck completely goes against all standards as he sets sails from society with Jim. Huck's ignorance of the social problems during the time period give an unbiased approach to slavery and treatment of African Americans. 

Mark Twain conveys racist issues through the adults. The actions and discussions of the adults show one's view of  society during this time period. This method is effective for Twain because he easily displays how one opinion is heavily influenced by the mass of numbers. I think that Twain uses adults to convey his important themes because it would be meaningful to the children. The conflict of racism could not be fairly debated between the adults in Twain's novel. This is because if one person opposed, then the majority will still over rule. The one who stood up is unseen due to the popular vote. These adults have no respectable morals on this subject and this is shown by the conformity of them. I don't think this is a good message for Huck to receive. It may make him carry the thought that his idea is irrelevant. Kids look up to adults, and this isn't the attitude adults should want to give off to children. 

As Huck dares to be different, Twain expresses the hope in the future society to follow what they believe. The journey on the Mississippi River is a way to measure the progress between Huck and Jim. The two face multiple obstacles in which they must work together in different social interactions. I think Twain successfully shows the impressive progress that can be achieved when people with the same ideas work together. Although Jim and Huck had many differences, their techniques allowed them to succeed. The raft shows the moral growth between the characters as they ignore the social standards. The boys work through their struggles with what they think is right, not by what society says. I think this accomplishment can be compared with the accomplishments within modern day society. 

Response to Course Material #5

I couldn't feel more relieved than I do now that I finished annotating Hamlet. I really enjoyed reading Hamlet and annotating helped me break down the different aspects of the play, but the annotations took so long I didn't think I was going to make it. Looking back at this now, I'm definitely going to annotate more during class while we read because it makes a difference in the long run. A new thing I'm going to try is just writing down short, fragmented thoughts while reading as a class, then I'll come back to my notes and I'll focus on what I wanted to highlight add more description so I have complete thoughts. By doing this, I think I'll be able to stay more engaged with the class while still taking little notes. I thought that we spent a lot of time on Hamlet and I'm glad we were able to spend as much time on it as we did. If we sped through it, there would be no way I could catch on to the motifs and themes of Hamlet. I liked that we were able to watch the two different productions of Hamlet. This allowed us to compare how different directors were effected by Shakespeare's work. Since Shakespeare leaves several matters unclear, the audience is forced to interpret the matter differently than the person next to them. I personally liked the second movie better. I think it helped me understand the full plot of Hamlet better seeing it in action. The second movie also was more descriptive; when we were watching certain scenes the movie would help me draw the connections I was unable to or missed in the reading. While I was reading Hamlet on my own, I had discovered that the more I got into the play, the easier it was to understand and follow. I actually found myself thinking in language such as Hamlet would, it was very strange and hard to make go away!! Anyway, I really enjoyed Hamlet and now I have to focus on acing the terms test for finals, wish me luck!

I'm Going to Meditate After This...

The Power of Concentration By Mark Konnikova

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/16/opinion/sunday/the-power-of-concentration.html?ref=opinion

In Mark Konnikova's work, he glorifies the incredible Sherlock Holmes and his remarkable success in his practice. Konnikova corralates his successful career to his simple tactics. Through the author's bold use of detail, imagery and syntax, he states Holmes practice of meditation allowed him to be the most legandary sleuth of all time. As the author declares this, he uses this to support his claim; meditation is the key to a successful life.

Reading this article was a great experience for me. It was neatly organized and the ideas flowed together perfectly. Konnikova created this peaceful read with the details he provided. He stated a claim of the benefits of meditation, supported that specific claim with an experiment and provided shocking and very supportive results. Konnikova clearly did some background on his subject, and all of the details he provides are essential in his piece. Without these details, the reader would not be convinced on his claims of meditation. Another way Konnikova uses his large amount of data to his advantage is by comparing. In a multiasking experiment, the effects were made clear to the reader, "spending approximately 36 seconds on each, in contrast to the 48 to 50 average tasks attempted by the other groups (Konnikova)". The written numbers allows the readers to truly see the results.

Meditation is mostly about concentration, as Konnikova words it, "the ability to quiet your mind, focus your attention on the present and dismiss any distractions that come your way." After the many complex experiments and psychoanalytical explanations, the author creates an image which simplifies each concept of meditation. This image circulates back to Sherlock Holmes. Konnikova says that meditation is what occurs as one exhales a milky cloud of smoke while taping together the tips of ones fingers. This strong imagery illuminates the classic visual of Sherlock Holmes; all his focus on a single element (Konnikova).

The strongest part of this review is the conclusion. I give props to Konnikova for creating this conclusion because there was a lot of points to sum up, and he managed to keep it short without leaving out the essentials. The syntax used in the conclusion is what made it stand out above every other paragraph. First off, Konnikova covers all of the benefits discussed by stating, "Mindfulness may have a prophylactic effect: it can strengthen the areas that are most susceptible to cognitive decline". The colon is what makes this sentence bold, because it breaks down his main thought. Next, he uses the word "unitask" as he originally did in his introductory paragraph. Not only does this make the reader draw the connection, but it concludes the main idea of unitasking to multitask, which is the most profound benefit of meditation. The circular pattern of the words is a great technique seen many time by this author. Lastly, the syntax used does a great job by making the topic relatable to all audiences. Konnikova strongly signs off with syntax, "We may be investing in a sounder mental future-no matter how old we are."